This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On 6/19/09, Leonitis <rubixqb@gmail.com> wrote: > On a side note, is it not enough to select "soft float" in the configuration > to avoid the wasted hardware interrupts to the "extinct" FPU? With the old ABI, binaries compiled with hard float cannot be linked with those compiled with soft float so you need an entire new set of libraries too. For example, FP function parameters and return values are passed in FPU registers. Read the wiki page I pointed at > Back to the problem, how could I approach isolating this bug, if it is > indeed a problem with scanf() (or is it almost certainly not to do with > scanf)? The usual way: divide the problem space in two, devise a test that tells you which half the problem lies in. Repeat :) M -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |