This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: uClibc verses Glibc

From: "Cliff Brake" <cliff dot brake at gmail dot com>
To: "Rowan Potgieter" <baldo dot forum at gmail dot com>
Cc: crossgcc at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:35:06 -0400
Subject: Re: uClibc verses Glibc
References: <3b51ed3c0608150715w7c999bfete400d266b30247bd@mail.gmail.com>

On 8/15/06, Rowan Potgieter <baldo.forum@gmail.com> wrote:

I was just wondering which is better, uClibc or Glibc? Obviously they
both have their pro's and cons's. I'm in the process of building an
embedded kernel for the Intel IXP425 and I've come across alot of
problems regarding Glibc, I'm not saying its because of Glibc alot are
probably toolchain related or I dont have the latest patches but...
which would the people of cross-gcc recommend?


You can try both with the openembedded (http://openembedded.org)
system.  OE has excellent support for the IXP425 as the Linksys NSLU2
uses this processor.

I generally use glibc unless there is a good reason to use something smaller.

Cliff

--
=======================
Cliff Brake
http://bec-systems.com

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq

References:
- uClibc verses Glibc
  - From: Rowan Potgieter

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]