This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [linux-sh:03294] Re: Weird behaviour, possible compiler bug?

From: Alex Bennee <kernel-hacker at bennee dot com>
To: Daniel Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
Cc: "LinuxSH (sf)" <linuxsh-dev at lists dot sourceforge dot net>,"Linux-SH (m17n)" <linux-sh at m17n dot org>,Cross Mailing List <crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:14:51 +0100
Subject: Re: [linux-sh:03294] Re: Weird behaviour, possible compiler bug?
Organization: Hackers Inc
References: <1092849718.29012.33.camel@cambridge.braddahead.com> <4123AF01.5090508@kegel.com>

On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 20:33, Daniel Kegel wrote:
> Alex Bennee wrote:
> > Has anyone been building SH kernels with Dan's latest crosstool gcc?
> This is a known problem,
> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13260

Ahh, thats good - at least its know.

> Crosstool has a pair of patches for this,
> gcc-3.3.3/pr13260-test.patch
> gcc-3.3.3/pr13260-fix-3.3.3.patch
> 
> but since you're using a funny prerelease, I suspect they
> weren't applied.

Hmm, that was the one crosstool built out of the box. I suspect I need
to recheck my config.

> Have you tried building a kernel with gcc-3.4.1 yet?
> - Dan

Will do.

-- 
Alex, Kernel Hacker: http://www.bennee.com/~alex/

Variables don't; constants aren't.


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

References:
- Weird behaviour, possible compiler bug?
  - From: Alex Bennee
- Re: Weird behaviour, possible compiler bug?
  - From: Daniel Kegel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]