This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
fyi. Anyone thinking of updating to glibc-2.3.2 on ppc403 might want to know about this. - Dan
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Linking with -lc Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 10:42:35 +0200 From: Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> To: H. J. Lu <hjl@lucon.org> CC: Harris, Jeff <JeffH@aiinet.com>, amodra@bigpond.net.au, GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com>, 'binutils@sources.redhat.com' <binutils@sources.redhat.com> References: <3B785392832ED71192AE00D0B7B0D75B1C6498@aimail.aiinet.com> <3B785392832ED71192AE00D0B7B0D75B1C6498@aimail.aiinet.com>
On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 03:38:49PM -0400, Harris, Jeff wrote: > The output from the objdump command is: > > 00114fa4 g DF .text 00000894 GLIBC_2.3.2 __muldf3
This definitely is wrong. __muldf3 in glibc should be for backward compatibility only. Someone working on pcc should take a look at sysdeps/powerpc/nofpu/Versions and fix them similar to the way in sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc32/libgcc-compat.S.
Argh, this somehow passed me by. This means glibc-2.3.2 is quite broken in the ppc-nofpu case. If these symbols are exported at all from glibc, they shouldn't be exported as default symbols. So at least a libgcc-compat.S is needed here (a Version script extension to create a non-default versioned symbol would be nice), even better would be to remove the symbols from the Versions file again, I don't think there are glibc-2.3.2 based nofpu distros out there, so that should be fine. What was the reasoning to add these symbols in the first place?
> I didn't mention in my original email, but linking with -lgcc before -lc > works. This is what happens when gcc calls ld from the output of gcc -v. >
I will see if I can reproduce it on Linux/x86. I suspect it is a ppc specific bug.
That's normal behaviour, libgcc has all these symbols and gcc correctly links '-lgcc -lc -lgcc', but adding -lc to the gcc link line undos that and then breaks with a the broken glibc-2.3.2.
-- Dan Kegel http://www.kegel.com http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045
------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |