This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: does this LD_LIBRARY_PATH make any sense ?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at wasabisystems dot com>
- To: "Banibrata Dutta" <dutta at india dot hp dot com>
- Cc: <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: 28 Apr 2004 08:08:34 -0400
- Subject: Re: does this LD_LIBRARY_PATH make any sense ?
- References: <008a01c42d0c$6693b470$c0714c0f@nt13192>
"Banibrata Dutta" <dutta@india.hp.com> writes:
> [dutta@pttlnx1 dutta]$ echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> /home/dutta/GNUstep/Libraries/ix86/linux-gnu/gnu-gnu-gnu:/home/dutta/GNUstep
> /Libraries/ix86/linux-gnu:/usr/GNUstep/Local/Libraries/ix86/linux-gnu/gnu-
> gnu-gnu:/usr/GNUstep/Local/Libraries/ix86/linux-gnu:/usr/GNUstep/Network/Lib
> raries/ix86/linux-gnu/gnu-gnu-gnu:/usr/GNUstep/Network/Libraries/ix86/linu
> x-gnu:/usr/GNUstep/System/Libraries/ix86/linux-gnu/gnu-gnu-gnu:/usr/GNUstep/
> System/Libraries/ix86/linux-gnu
This is not a binutils question.
The binutils are the GNU assembler, the GNU linker (not the dynamic
linker--that is, ld, not ld.so), gprof, and various minor binary
utility programs such as ar, nm, strip, objdump, and objcopy.
Questions about the dynamic linker, about dlopen, about gdb, about
core dumps, about the operating system, about anything other than the
GNU binutils, are not appropriate here.
Thanks.
Ian