This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Hi All.
I've recently been looking into gcc bug 10904, which involves gcc
generating instructions such as:
fdtox %f8,%f7
on SPARC64 [1].
Sun's assembler chokes on this construct, while gas silently accepts it
(and according to Sun's disassembler, the %f7 is encoded as %f38). One
consequence of this is that when using gas with gcc on sparc64, the
(broken) assembly is silently misassembled.
I've attached a patch against binutils 2.14 which I believe tightens up
these constraints.
Please CC me as I'm not on the list.
Cheers,
--Andrew
[1] The V9 arch manual I'm looking at doesn't seem to claim any alignment
constraints on rd for f?tox, although Sun's assembler seems to
believe otherwise.
Attachment:
binutils.patch
Description: Text document
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |