This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] fixes for kfreebsd-gnu triplet (revised)

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
To: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
Cc: dj at redhat dot com, robertmh at gnu dot org, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 20:43:24 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fixes for kfreebsd-gnu triplet (revised)
References: <20030830171520.GA1065@aragorn> <m3he3uns3f.fsf@redhat.com><200309031525.h83FPKo03461@greed.delorie.com><m3wucplvhl.fsf@redhat.com>

Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> writes:

> No - I believe that you still have control of the top level
> configure.in file.  The above just says that the binutils and gdb
> projects like to be informed of changes.  The binutils MAINTAINERS
> file says:
>
>   Note - patches to the top level configure.in and config.sub scripts
>   should be sent to: 
>
>     config-patches@gnu.org
>
>   and not to the binutils list.

Btw, this paragraph was added by you in revision 1.17, with a rather
confusing CVS log entry and no ChangeLog entry:

          Fix typos in ChangeLogs and update copyright notices

Looks like it was an unintentional change.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

References:
- Re: [PATCH] fixes for kfreebsd-gnu triplet (revised)
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: [PATCH] fixes for kfreebsd-gnu triplet (revised)
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [PATCH] fixes for kfreebsd-gnu triplet (revised)
  - From: Nick Clifton

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]