This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: How to reach ELF specification maintainers?
- From: Lars Brinkhoff <lars dot spam at nocrew dot org>
- To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- Cc: <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: 30 May 2002 15:49:24 +0200
- Subject: Re: How to reach ELF specification maintainers?
- Organization: nocrew
- References: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0205300927260.40827-100000@dair.pair.com>
Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com> writes:
> On 30 May 2002, Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
> > Lars Brinkhoff <lars@nocrew.org> writes:
> > > I'd like to register new architectures for the e_machine field
> > > in ELF headers. However, I haven't found any way to get in
> > > touch with ELF people.
> > I believe I found it now: registry@caldera.com.
> When you're certain (as in "confirmed contact") we should change
> all those places in the sources ;-) that mention
> registry@sco.com (well, without grepping, there's at least
> include/elf/common.h above where the other EM_* are #defined).
These grep hits seem relevant:
./bfd/doc/bfdint.texi:these magic numbers are assigned by SCO; if you want to get a magic
./bfd/doc/bfdint.texi:@email{registry@@sco.com}. In the BFD sources, the magic numbers are
./include/elf/common.h: are officially assigned by registry@sco.com. See below for a list of
./include/elf/common.h: unofficial e_machine number should eventually ask registry@sco.com for
I can take care of updating this. I'll send a patch when I hear from
the Caldera folks.
--
Lars Brinkhoff http://lars.nocrew.org/ Linux, GCC, PDP-10,
Brinkhoff Consulting http://www.brinkhoff.se/ HTTP programming