This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: 2.11.1
- To: Philip Blundell <philb at gnu dot org>
- Subject: Re: 2.11.1
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- Date: 19 Jun 2001 15:15:13 +0200
- Cc: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>, "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>,binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <E15CFg8-0001ps-00@kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org>
Philip Blundell <philb@gnu.org> writes:
> The binutils-2.11.1 archive was broken. I have deleted it from
> sources.redhat.com and asked ftp-upload to remove it from the gnu.org ftp
> site.
>
> Some of the recent patches to the toplevel Makefile seem to cause the
> "binutils" subdirectory to be left out of the tarfile. Alan, H.J: you have
> been making changes in this area recently -- would one of you care to fix it?
> My guess is that the direct culprit was:
>
> 2001-06-17 H.J. Lu <hjl@gnu.org>
>
> * Makefile.in (gas.tar.bz2): Pass TOOL=bfd PACKAGE=gas to make.
> (gas+binutils.tar.bz2): Likewise.
> (binutils.tar.bz2): Pass TOOL=bfd PACKAGE=binutils to make.
>
> since the do-proto-toplev rule uses $(TOOL) to control which directory is
> included.
>
> Once this problem is resolved I'll make a new release and call it 2.11.2.
I have some patches for bfd/elf64-x86-64.c that I like to see on the
2.11 branch. Shall I commit them now or wait until after the release?
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj