This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am


> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 09:57:36 -0800
> From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
> Cc: binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com

> # /work/ia64/bin/cygnus/20000303/gcc/xgcc -B/usr/ia64-cygnus-linux/ia64-cygnus-linux/bin/ -B/usr/ia64-cygnus-linux/ia64-cygnus-linux/lib/ -B/work/ia64/bin/cygnus/20000303/gcc/ -g -O2 -pipe -Dno_inhibit_libc -fvtable-thunks -D_GNU_SOURCE -fno-implicit-templates -Wl,-soname,libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 -shared -o libstdc++-3-libc6.1-2-2.10-ia64-000216.so `cat piclist` -lm 
> gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `/work/ia64/bin/cygnus/20000303/gcc/collect2': Argument list too long
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> 
> Does this answer your question? 
> 
> Any other objections to the latest patch to the top level Makefile.in?

What happens if you try the same line with -Wl,-v ?  I'd be very
interested in this 128k argument list that's getting passed.
-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@cygnus.com>

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]