This is the mail archive of the
automake@gnu.org
mailing list for the automake project.
spy.test on OpenBSD
- From: Jacob Meuser <jakemsr at jakemsr dot com>
- To: automake at gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 20:44:01 -0700
- Subject: spy.test on OpenBSD
I ran the regression tests for automake-1.8.5 (yes, I know there are
newer versions) on OpenBSD 3.7-beta. only failures were
libtool7.test and spy.test.
I think I understand the problem with libtool7.test, but the
spy.test, I don't fully understand what's going wrong there,
as it seems to work if I run it by hand:
puff:/home/portobj/automake-1.8.5/automake-1.8.5/tests% ./spy.test
/home/portobj/automake-1.8.5/automake-1.8.5/tests:/home/jakemsr/bin:/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/X11R6/bin
=== Running test ./spy.test
+ pwd
/home/portobj/automake-1.8.5/automake-1.8.5/tests/testSubDir
+ set -e
+ cat
+ > Makefile
+ << \EOF
+ touch b c
+ sleep 2
+ :
+ > a
+ make
`a' is up to date.
`a' is up to date.
+ cat a
+ test =
+ sleep 2
+ touch b
+ make
echo rule1 >> a
`a' is up to date.
+ cat a
+ test rule1 = rule1
+ :
+ > a
+ sleep 2
+ touch c
+ make
`a' is up to date.
echo rule2 >> a
+ cat a
+ test rule2 = rule2
puff:/home/portobj/automake-1.8.5/automake-1.8.5/tests% echo $?
0
puff:/home/portobj/automake-1.8.5/automake-1.8.5/tests%
why is this reported as FAIL? I couldn't find any mention of
spy.test issues from searching the archives on sources.redhat.com.
--
<jakemsr@jakemsr.com>