This is the mail archive of the
automake@gnu.org
mailing list for the automake project.
Distributing BUILT_SOURCES dependencies and not target
- From: Xavier Décoret <xdecoret at free dot fr>
- To: automake at gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 16:00:39 +0200
- Subject: Distributing BUILT_SOURCES dependencies and not target
Hi,
I am compiling a project with a swig generated file. Swig is a tool that
takes a foo.i file and generates a foo_wrap.cxx (it can do more but no
our concerne here ;-)).
In my Makefile.am, I put:
line 1: foo_wrap.cxx: foo.i
line 2: $SWIG -c++ -python foo.i
line 3:
line 4: BUILT_SOURCES: foo_wrap.cxx
line 5: libfoo.la_SOURCES: foo_wrap.cxx
line 6:
line 7: dist_data_DATA: foo.i
First question: I put line 7 because I want the .i file to be
distributed so people can re-generate the .cxx file with their own
version of swig ($SWIG is set by a m4 command SWIG_PROG in
configure.in). Is this the correct way to do it. It seems make dist
produce tarballs with the file in it som I am happy.
Second question: The problem is that foo_wrap.cxx gets distributed too.
And since it is always more recent that .i file after I ran make. I
don't have the expected behaviour. Downloaders of the lib won't get the
foo_wrap.cxx regenerated. How do I remove this file from the dist.
Third question: with this Makefile.am, make dist produce a tarball that
I can install, compile, etc... but make distcheck complains that it
cannot find foo.i!! But it *is* in the tarball?!? I don't get at all
what's happening here.
Thanks for the help.