This is the mail archive of the automake@gnu.org mailing list for the automake project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: automake -vs- huge projects

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Alexandre Duret-Lutz <adl at src dot lip6 dot fr>
Cc: Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim at redhat dot com>, automake at gnu dot org
Date: 16 Dec 2003 18:41:49 -0700
Subject: Re: automake -vs- huge projects
References: <87pteopv13.fsf@fleche.redhat.com><pan.2003.12.16.20.01.10.760496@redhat.com><2003-12-17-00-15-21+30253+duret_g@lrde.epita.fr>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <adl@src.lip6.fr> writes:

adl> Furthermore, generally it does not work to compile both the .o
adl> and .lo objects of a source file (in the last example Automake
adl> is expected to warn that these files are being built both with
adl> and without Libtool), so it sounds safe to remove the rules
adl> which are not used.

This would be a great change, but unfortunately it only gets us down
to 3M, which is still about 6x too large.

Tom

References:
- automake -vs- huge projects
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects
  - From: Thomas Fitzsimmons
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects
  - From: Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]