This is the mail archive of the automake@gnu.org mailing list for the automake project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: automake & flex's -P option

From: Richard Dawe <rich at phekda dot freeserve dot co dot uk>
To: Akim Demaille <akim at epita dot fr>
Cc: automake at gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 11:02:25 +0000
Subject: Re: automake & flex's -P option
References: <3E63E107.83C716C9@phekda.freeserve.co.uk><mv4d6kvws62.fsf@nostromo.lrde.epita.fr><mv44r61qb7e.fsf@nostromo.lrde.epita.fr>

Hello.

Akim Demaille wrote:
[snip]
> I think a lot could be done to improve the interface provided that we
> require Bison and Flex.  The problem here stems on the willingness to
> be yacc/lex portable.
[snip]

Out of interest: Is it a hard requirement that automake should work with lex,
yacc rather than requiring flex, bison? Or is it likely to change in the
future?

Thanks, bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: automake & flex's -P option
  - From: Thomas E. Dickey

References:
- automake & flex's -P option
  - From: Richard Dawe
- Re: automake & flex's -P option
  - From: Akim Demaille
- Re: automake & flex's -P option
  - From: Akim Demaille

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]