This is the mail archive of the automake@gnu.org mailing list for the automake project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: automake & flex's -P option

From: Alexandre Duret-Lutz <duret_g at lrde dot epita dot fr>
To: Richard Dawe <rich at phekda dot freeserve dot co dot uk>
Cc: automake at gnu dot org
Cc: Akim Demaille <akim at epita dot fr>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 23:15:07 +0100
Subject: Re: automake & flex's -P option
References: <3E63E107.83C716C9@phekda.freeserve.co.uk><mv4d6kvws62.fsf@nostromo.lrde.epita.fr><3E763C21.FF50765A@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>

>>> "Richard" == Richard Dawe <rich at phekda dot freeserve dot co dot uk> writes:

[...]

 Richard> So, back to my original suggestion: Modify the
 Richard> automake rules to invoke lex with the -t option and
 Richard> pipe the output to $LEX_OUTPUT_FILE. Then the use -P
 Richard> or %option prefix will not break the automake
 Richard> rule. But how portable is 'lex -t'?

lex -t, if portable, seems attractive to me because it would
allow us to drop ylwrap from the lex rules.

-- 
Alexandre Duret-Lutz

References:
- automake & flex's -P option
  - From: Richard Dawe
- Re: automake & flex's -P option
  - From: Akim Demaille
- Re: automake & flex's -P option
  - From: Richard Dawe

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]