This is the mail archive of the
automake@gnu.org
mailing list for the automake project.
Multiple makefiles and rules for CONFIG_HEADER and CONFIG_FILEentries
- From: Sander Niemeijer <niemeijer at science-and-technology dot nl>
- To: automake at gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:31:13 +0100
- Subject: Multiple makefiles and rules for CONFIG_HEADER and CONFIG_FILEentries
Hi,
I have a package that uses multiple makefiles: one toplevel makefile
and some makefiles in subdirectories.
The build in several of these subdirectories requires the use of a
single include file (lets call it foo.h) that is created from foo.h.in
by configure. Now I recently discovered that automake places the rules
to rebuild foo.h from foo.h.in (with the use of a stamp-h* file) in the
Makefile of the directory where foo.h will appear if that directory has
a Makefile and otherwise put it in the toplevel Makefile. But it won't
put these rules in any of the other Makefiles.
Of course this leaves me with a problem if I change foo.h.in and
perform a make, since for targets in my subdirectories that depend on
foo.h make won't try to rebuild foo.h and thus these targets won't be
rebuild either.
I would like to know whether anybody knows a way to have the foo.h.in
-> foo.h (with appropriate stamp-h* usage) dependencies included in all
my makefiles that contain targets with dependencies on foo.h.
I'm currently considering to let configure create a separate foo.h in
each of the directories that need foo.h (through a
AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([dir1/foo.h:inc/foo.h.in dir2/foo.h:inc/foo.h.in]),
but I would rather generate only one version of foo.h in the directory
where foo.h.in resides.
And I already know that using only one Makefile for my project would
also solve the problem, but I would rather like to know whether my
problem would also be solvable within a multiple Makefile project.
Regards,
Sander