This is the mail archive of the
automake@gnu.org
mailing list for the automake project.
Re: What is the correct way of handling generated docs?
- From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
- To: karl at freefriends dot org
- Cc: bkorb at pacbell dot net, automake at gnu dot org, help-texinfo at gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 18:28:50 +0200
- Subject: Re: What is the correct way of handling generated docs?
- References: <200112301446.fBUEkXl14581@f7.net>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 09:46:33 -0500
> From: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry)
>
> I don't know about doxygen, but javadoc has a well-developed mechanism
> for maintaining the documentation for functions/classes/etc. in the
> source file, and standard tools for extracting it.
Can the Javadoc-derived parts be @include'd in a Texinfo source?
Bruce could then list them as prerequisites of the Info files, not of
the Texinfo files. (I'm thinking about something similar to the
`chew' program used by several Cygnus-born projects.)