This is the mail archive of the
automake@gnu.org
mailing list for the automake project.
Re: path specified in SOURCE definition
- To: Fausto Sanchez <fas at andiamo dot com>
- Subject: Re: path specified in SOURCE definition
- From: Ganesan Rajagopal <rganesan at myrealbox dot com>
- Date: 29 Aug 2001 10:48:28 +0530
- Cc: automake at gnu dot org
- List-Id: Discussion list for automake <automake.gnu.org>
- References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010828214213.00b5dfe8@andiamo.com>
>>>>> "Fausto" == Fausto Sanchez <fas@andiamo.com> writes:
> Hi,
> Some or our developers have created their Makefile.am as such:
> bin_PROGRAMS = foo
> foo_SOURCES = foo.c foo.h bar/bar.c bar/bar.h
> Is it illegal to use paths in your source definition, I couldn't find
> anything in the book on this.
It is illegal in automake 1.4.
> If this is illegal how does one go about > doing something like the above
> if the developers insist it to be done this way. Is it just a matter of
> creating another Makefile.am in the sub-directory, create a convenience
> library and link the executable with it?
Upgrade to automake 1.5 which was released last week.
Ganesan
--
R. Ganesan (rganesan@novell.com) | Ph: 91-80-5731856 Ext: 2149
Novell India Development Center. | #include <std_disclaimer.h>