This is the mail archive of the automake@gnu.org mailing list for the automake project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

automake or libtool question

To: automake at gnu dot org
Subject: automake or libtool question
From: "Paul F. Kunz" <Paul_Kunz at SLAC dot Stanford dot EDU>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 02:29:10 -0700
List-Id: Discussion list for automake <automake.gnu.org>
References: <GGQDH5$I186KdUwFg8_uC2NXse9U9OVVAOmP9M4lVIcn90wFtc@libero.it><87u208z8ds.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <20010720024446.A28906@ixion.tartarus.org><20010720025612.B28906@ixion.tartarus.org> <87ae1z7fha.fsf@creche.redhat.com>
Reply-to: Paul_Kunz at SLAC dot Stanford dot EDU

   I'm building a C++ library with gcc 3.0 on a Red Hat Linux 7.1
system.  Gcc is installed in /usr/local/test.  When I build an
executable that links to the library, one must also link against
libstdc++.so in /usr/local/test/lib since the version in /usr/lib has
a different ABI.

   How do I get the correct path to libstdc++.so built into my
library with the users needing to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: automake or libtool question
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: automake or libtool question
  - From: Gary V. Vaughan

References:
- Should automake add X_LIBS to LIBS automatically?
  - From: mmiglia@libero.it
- Re: Should automake add X_LIBS to LIBS automatically?
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Should automake add X_LIBS to LIBS automatically?
  - From: Richard Boulton
- Re: Should automake add X_LIBS to LIBS automatically?
  - From: Richard Boulton
- Re: Should automake add X_LIBS to LIBS automatically?
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]