This is the mail archive of the
automake@gnu.org
mailing list for the automake project.
Re: config.sub/config.guess license exception, but not for 'missing'
- To: "Neulinger, Nathan" <nneul at umr dot edu>
- Subject: Re: config.sub/config.guess license exception, but not for 'missing'
- From: Akim Demaille <akim at epita dot fr>
- Date: 09 Jun 2001 20:14:00 +0200
- Cc: "'autoconf at gnu dot org'" <autoconf at gnu dot org>, Automake List <automake at gnu dot org>
- List-Id: Discussion list for automake <automake.gnu.org>
- References: <F349BC4F5799D411ACE100D0B706B3BB768DCB@umr-mail03.cc.umr.edu>
>>>>> "Nathan" == Nathan Neulinger <Neulinger> writes:
Nathan> Would y'all consider extending the license exception to
Nathan> include the 'missing' script as well? (I'm referring to the
Nathan> exception that allows distributing autoconf support files with
Nathan> apps that are not gpld. I'm not sure if there are other
Nathan> support files that are gpl'd, but the same request would apply
Nathan> there.
Hi, this is a question for Automake, not Autoconf.