This is the mail archive of the
automake@gnu.org
mailing list for the automake project.
Re: Linking with installed libtool-constructed library
- To: Alexandre Oliva <oliva at lsd dot ic dot unicamp dot br>
- Subject: Re: Linking with installed libtool-constructed library
- From: Steve Robbins <steven dot robbins at videotron dot ca>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 01:17:01 -0500
- Cc: automake at gnu dot org, libtool at gnu dot org
- List-Id: Discussion list for automake <automake.gnu.org><mailto:automake-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <20010128053312.A955@nyongwa.montreal.qc.ca> <orwvbfa0qr.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 06:19:08PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2001, Steve Robbins <steven.robbins@videotron.ca> wrote:
>
> > libtool --mode=link gcc -o foo foo.o /usr/local/libbar.la
>
> > (rather than just "gcc ... -lbar"). This allows libtool a chance to
> > do special stuff.
>
> > So, what's the recommended way of making this happen?
>
> Use a CVS version of libtool and it will do The Right Thing (TM).
Aha, yes it does. Cool!
There is a patch for "automake" in the CVS libtool README.
Apart from that, are there any things I need to look out for,
if I mix CVS libtool with the released automake and autoconf?
-S