This is the mail archive of the
automake@gnu.org
mailing list for the automake project.
Re: Handle Libtool from multi-language-branch
- To: tromey at redhat dot com
- Subject: Re: Handle Libtool from multi-language-branch
- From: Raja R Harinath <harinath at cs dot umn dot edu>
- Date: 22 Dec 2000 19:36:42 -0600
- Cc: automake at gnu dot org
- List-Id: Discussion list for automake <automake.gnu.org><mailto:automake-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <d97l4srxq6.fsf@han.cs.umn.edu> <874rzw53yy.fsf@creche.redhat.com>
Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:
> >>>>> "Raja" == Raja R Harinath <harinath@cs.umn.edu> writes:
> Raja> The following patch adds minimal support for Libtool from the
> Raja> multi-language-branch.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Do we need to have automake look for these new files and run
> libtoolize if they aren't found?
That may be difficult. There's little to indicate that they're needed
except the version of libtoolize/libtool.m4.
> Or is simply including them if they exist sufficient?
That's why the "minimal" part. This allows 'make dist' to work right
with Libtool MLB.
> I'm checking this in regardless; we can work from here if need be.
Thanks.
- Hari
--
Raja R Harinath ------------------------------ harinath@cs.umn.edu
"When all else fails, read the instructions." -- Cahn's Axiom
"Our policy is, when in doubt, do the right thing." -- Roy L Ash