This is the mail archive of the automake@gnu.org mailing list for the automake project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: the appropriate location for depcomp

To: akim at epita dot fr
Subject: Re: the appropriate location for depcomp
From: OKUJI Yoshinori <okuji at kuicr dot kyoto-u dot ac dot jp>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 17:25:22 +0900
Cc: tromey at cygnus dot com, automake at gnu dot org
References: <20000320185550S.okuji@kuicr.kyoto-u.ac.jp><200003252159.NAA24483@ferrule.cygnus.com><mv4k8ioj09a.fsf@nostromo.lrde.epita.fr>

From: Akim Demaille <akim@epita.fr>
Subject: Re: the appropriate location for depcomp
Date: 27 Mar 2000 10:16:49 +0200

> If you mean for *all* the files, I'm all for it.  Amongst the various
> choices, the best one is most probably the one which needs the
> smallest amount of documentation, hence everything in top_srcdir.

  I quite like your idea. I was wondering why some scripts
(e.g. mdate-sh) was not located at top_srcdir.

Okuji

References:
- the appropriate location for depcomp
  - From: OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: the appropriate location for depcomp
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: the appropriate location for depcomp
  - From: Akim Demaille

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]