This is sources Bugzilla
Bugzilla Version 2.17.5
Bugzilla Bug 690
  [localedef] Be less strict with keyword ordering Last modified: 2007-10-11 02:39:37
Bug List: First Last (This bug is not in your list)   Show list      Query page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 690   Hardware:   Reporter: Denis Barbier <barbier@linuxfr.org>
Host: Target: Build:
Product:     Add CC:
Component:   Version:   CC:
Remove selected CCs
Status: RESOLVED   Priority:  
Resolution: WONTFIX   Severity:  
Assigned To: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>   Target Milestone:  
Flags: Requestee:
  backport ()
  examined ()
  testsuite ()
Summary:
Keywords:

Attachment Description Type Created Actions
keywords_ordering.patch Be less strict with keyword ordering in LC_COLLATE section patch 2005-01-22 20:58 Edit | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 690 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 690 blocks: 686

Additional Comments:


Leave as RESOLVED WONTFIX
Reopen bug
Mark bug as VERIFIED

View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing


Description:   Last confirmed: 0000-00-00 00:00 Opened: 2005-01-22 20:57
Localedef is pretty strict with keywords ordering in LC_COLLATE section.
One consequence is that it is sometimes hard to extend iso14651_t1 template.
For instance, am_ET uses a hack to define a new script, and the patch
sent to BZ686 chokes on this file.
Here is a patch to let localedef be less strict.

------- Additional Comment #1 From Denis Barbier 2005-01-22 20:58 -------
Created an attachment (id=385)
Be less strict with keyword ordering in LC_COLLATE section

------- Additional Comment #2 From Ulrich Drepper 2007-09-30 05:21 -------
You need to provide a concrete example where this is beneficial.

Aside, the patch doesn't apply anymore.

------- Additional Comment #3 From Denis Barbier 2007-09-30 14:21 -------
This patch is needed by BZ686, so the question is whether new feature implemented
by BZ686 has a chance to be checked in.  If yes, I will provide updated patches.
If you dislike BZ686, you can close these 2 bug reports.

------- Additional Comment #4 From Ulrich Drepper 2007-10-11 02:39 -------
This patch is not needed for the preprocessor.  I've implemented something which
doesn't require this relaxation.

Bug List: First Last (This bug is not in your list)   Show list      Query page      Enter new bug
Actions: New | Query | bug # | Reports | Requests   New Account | Log In